My viewing experience of Contact was very different to that of ID4 the previous year. For a start I wasn’t there on opening night, admittedly wary of whether Carl Sagan’s excellent novel would translate to the screen. Then on telly I saw a ‘review’ show – can’t recall the title – where they asked the public, usually 4 random young folk (early 20’s – ageist!) what they thought of a particular movie. They had seen Contact, 3 girls and 1 lad. The ladies thought Contact was “boring” (though one did concede it was well made, just not her cup of char); the nerdy bloke raved to the rafters. Still unconvinced, a couple of nights later I went along. If you’ve not seen the film, be aware this ramble will contain spoilers…

Contact (PG). Running time: 150m Director: Robert Zemekis. Screenplay: James V. Hart, Michael Goldenberg. Story: Carl Sagan, Ann Druyan. Starring: Jodie Foster, Matthew McConaughey, Tom Skerritt, James Woods, Jena Malone, John Hurt, Angela Bassett, Adolf Hitler. Cinematography: Don Burgess. Music: Alan Silvestri.
Written by: Therewolf
There were maybe 15-20 people in the theatre, predominantly male (guess they saw the same telly show as me and trust to gender!). Disappointing turn-out. I found my expectations dropping by the second. Then Contact opened and I was aboard Mr Sagan’s Cosmos ship. Now, I could fill this whole review describing and conjecturing on this sequence alone but shall try – try – to rein it in.
Last in as the lights were dimming, box of popcorn placed on the floor as I got myself comfortable. Radio noise bursts around me. I look up to see Earth hanging in space. The din is incredible. The camera accelerates away from Earth orbit and embarks on a rapid journey of the Solar System. The sonic tumult, songs and broadcasts dipping in and out of range, begins to dial back through the years. This jumble of sound starts to thin as first, we leave our system behind – I try to keep our sun in view for as long as I can, cos that’s where I live and if it’s lost to sight I might never make it back. Then it’s gone. We spin away from our Milky Way galaxy and see it’s not just ours, there are thousands, millions… billions of them. So why do I still feel lonely? Earth has been screaming into a void and no one can hear us. There is a moment, in the silence, when you hear a solitary, ethereal voice from the background microwave – it’s the shiver-down-the-spine moment, the realisation you’re a long way from home. As the journey and the silence continue, it becomes a humbling experience, this drift through space and time, you feel small and insignificant, kind of lost. The stars, the galaxies and nebulae, they stream past, too many to count or comprehend, feels like the centre of the Universe and we start to hear sounds again. We see a reflection, then we emerge from Jodie Foster’s digitally composed iris looking out from young Ellie’s eye, already making her wise beyond her years.
When the sequence finished and I remembered to start breathing again, I realised that I was gripping the seat arms. I looked to the nearest fellow attendee quite a few seats away; he was slouched, shovelling popcorn into his cakehole like a mechanical digger shovels soil into a skip. It was surreal. We had just seen human existence defined on a cosmic scale. You don’t often see that coming from Hollywood. It’s an important, bravura piece of film making. How could the rest of Contact live up to that…?
Okay, the plot: Eleanor Arroway is an astronomer working within the SETI program (Search For Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence). She’s struggling, ridiculed by her boss, David Drumlin (Tom Skerritt), ridiculed by colleagues. When her funding gets pulled, then her scope time, her quest appears to be at a dead end. But then, in the nick of time, Earth (or is it for her personally?) is sent a message from the stars. There follows a power struggle as Drumlin moves in to undermine Ellie when it becomes apparent the message is in fact a blue print for a space-faring vehicle. This also grabs the attention of National Security Advisor Michael Kitz (James Woods) who is concerned the vehicle may be aggressive in some way. Despite reservations, they go ahead and construct The Machine. Drumlin gazumps Ellie by being picked to be the (un)lucky astronaut who gets to take a ride in the alien contraption when her ex-lover and Christian advisor to the White House, Palmer Joss (Matthew McConaughey), sets her up with a theological question he knows she will duck. However, they’ve all reckoned without a crazy religious fanatic who gains entry to the launch centre and knackers the mission in spectacular fashion. All hope is lost until Ellie is contacted by reclusive billionaire S R Hadden (John Hurt) who has funded the construction of a second machine in secret…
For a start, I do like the various scenes at Arecibo and the VLA (Very Large Array), all the control room stuff, particularly when they detect the signal, characters running around spouting verbal hieroglyphics at each other. I get a kick out of that in films in general anyway. Mr Sagan apparently clashed with Zemeckis over the depiction of the signal discovery. You know, Ellie outside with her headphones on? Not how it’s done, apparently. Computers do all the searching, they can hear better, on every frequency. Seriously, what was Zemeckis supposed to do? Point his camera at a bleeping computer monitor? Or better still, a hard copy print-out. Ellie is obsessed, she knows the computers are searching better than she ever could but listening is how she thinks, how she deals with her life and her loss. And anyway, I think Zemeckis does okay, intercutting between Ellie and the hardware detecting the same thing and if you watch carefully, the computer spots the signal first. I think it’s genius that the first message from another species is our own footage of Adolf Hitler returned. The first and only reaction from the audience at the screening came when they realised the image they were seeing was that of a swastika. I think at this point, certainly if they hadn’t read the book, they thought Earth was about to be invaded by Nazi aliens! Kitz’s reaction is great, plus a little later on, draws this exchange:
“That they recorded it and sent it back is simply their way of saying ‘hello we heard you…,’” Drumlin ventures.
“Or, Sieg Heil, you’re our kind of people,” Kitz shoots back.
Jodie Foster is the heartbeat of Contact. She’s believable, sometimes unlikable, but driven. And, hell, she’s stunning in that evening dress, she goes from a duckling to a swan. The supporting cast, for the most part is solid if unspectacular, could’ve been stronger in one or two roles. Tom Skerritt does okay as Drumlin, just a total smarmpot, schmoozing his way into the hot seat. Angela Bassett is pretty much underused as Chief Of Staff Rachel Constantine. Maybe, instead of CG’ing around with Bill Clinton they could’ve made her President. William Fichtner plays Ellie’s blind friend Kent Clark (really?) and to be honest, I didn’t find him convincing. James Woods’s Kitz is a brilliantly understated performance. I love that scene between him and Constantine near the end, after the official inquiry has given Ellie a proper chasing and you see the attitude of a cagey politician come to the fore:
“I assume you read the confidential findings report from the investigating committee,” Constantine says to him.
“I flipped through it.”
“I was especially interested in the section on Arroway’s video unit. The one that recorded the static?”
“Continue.”
“The fact that it recorded static isn’t what interests me.”
Kitz has a real think about it. “Continue…”
“What interests me is that it recorded approximately 18 hours of it.”
Another pause. “That is interesting, isn’t it…”
By far the oddest character is that of S R Hadden (John Hurt) who here, is basically a deus ex machina. He pops up to give her funding when she least expects (deserves) it. He pops up again to help along the signal investigation by discovering the “primer” for the message. Finally, he pops up with a second Machine which he expects us to accept with the line; “Why build one when you can have two at twice the price.” Eh? In the book it’s simple, other nations are building their own Machine so there’s another one to turn to when disaster strikes. By far the biggest loser in all of this is the Palmer Joss character. Not only is McConaughey unremittingly bland, Joss is reduced to flinging theological bombs at Ellie which she can barely defuse. Where the hell did the interesting bloke in the novel go?
There are some phenomenal VFX in Contact, the subtle stuff rather than the set-pieces. That’s not to say The Machine test/ launch sequences aren’t all that, they are stunning and they’ve got a certain ‘Apollo countdown’ vibe to them. But, I love the scene with young Ellie (Jena Malone) running toward the camera in slo-mo, only she isn’t. She reaches out and it’s actually her reflection in the medicine cabinet mirror. While I’m on it, Jena gets another couple of nice little moments. After her father’s (David Morse) tragic death, the priest explains it away as God’s will. Ellie, crouched down on the front step, dismisses him instantly: “Should’ve kept some medicine in the downstairs bathroom. Then I could’ve gotten to it sooner.” Then she stands to look down on him. Then there’s the heartbreaking scene where she gets on her CB radio and sends out a call: “CQ… this is W9GFO, do you copy? Dad, this is Ellie, come back. Are you there…?” My favourite moment is when adult Ellie, floating in her tin can, gazes in awe at the celestial heavens surrounding her. You then see the fleeting image of young Ellie pass across her face. Speaking personally, it’s a powerful, emotional moment. We come full circle too as the camera zooms into her eye and onto an alien beach. It’s just a pity Zemeckis didn’t stick with the book; there were five crew members aboard The Machine originally, that is, five different cultures, five alternative beliefs. For me, the ending severely weakens the whole concept. And what better way, on film, to bring disparate religions together to send one unifying message to the audience. In the end, the movie doesn’t deal with human/ alien first contact – but simply Ellie reunited with her dad. Nice enough, but it is anti-climactic. Plus, the Big Message For Humanity is basically; “Thanks for coming. You can go home now. We’ll call you again sometime…”
Contact is a thoughtful, almost painfully respectful film. Is it a good one? Yes it is, with several reservations, but it could have been better had it grown a pair of steel balls and carried more of the novel through in the telling. There is an uneasy alliance between the book and the screenplay. I’ve always considered Hollywood to be pro-God and therefore expected to see an airbrushing of Mr Sagan’s more contentious arguments with regard to science and religion. One scene to rankle me is between Ellie and Palmer, who have become romantically entangled. Ellie has just admitted she cannot believe in God without proof:
“Did you love your father?” Joss asks her.
“Yes, very much,” she answers.
“Prove it.”
In the novel, there are many thought provoking questions asked of religion but none make it to the film. With the passage above, the screenplay has asked for proof in the existence of love; Ellie can’t answer that, as the writers are aware, she’s got no comeback. I thought it a very underhanded way to, not only hamstring the character but justify a belief system. It’s frustrating because in the book it’s a fencing match, all parry and thrust with Ellie and Palmer seeking to enlighten the other and this culminates in the ‘Focault’s Pendulum’ scene. Here, Ellie pits her scientific knowledge against his faith by standing in front of the swinging pendulum and though science has taught her the pendulum bob cannot swing back farther than it’s starting point, Ellie flinches. Easily filmable and a lightly humorous way to show these two characters coming to understand each other. Instead, the screenplay seeks to diminish Ellie emotionally. Religion stands and judges her. Y’know what saddens me? The film doesn’t quite want to flat out say we’ve made contact with an intelligent alien species. To the point where, even at the end when Ellie is teaching the kids…
A lad asks: “Are there other people out there in the Universe?”
“That’s a good question. What do you think?”
“I dunno.”
“That’s a good answer. Sceptic, huh.”
No, it’s not a good answer. Ellie can’t believe that, not after what she’s been through for 150 minutes. This character is rendered almost toothless; she has turned into a female Joss. So, the movie is telling us to be sceptical too. Did she really go anywhere or was it all in her mind? Her video recorded 18 hours of static, safe to say she went somewhere. But still the film can’t say it. The kid can’t answer “Yes”. Considering this scene is set 18 months on I’m wondering if the inquiry’s findings have been made public. You’d think so, in which case the kid would now be aware that humans aren’t alone in the Universe.
Intelligent Sf is hard to come by in Hollywood. Somehow, Contact manages to shimmy around all the usual stereotypical pitfalls of this genre and emerges as a solid, if flawed, slice of storytelling.






I forget about this film when I think of “smart, make you think” sci-fi movies like 2001. Probably would have enjoyed it more at the time had I read the book first or they had included more of the book.
Kind of long for the days of the old b&w’s on tv like Invaders from Mars and Day the Earth Stood Still.
Good write up as always Wolf.
Very good review. previous to moon, was this the last hard sci-fi movie Hollywood has burped out? well, District 9 technically. anyway, the review was deep enough that I don’t have much to quibble with, other than I didn’t know there were 5 crew members in the ending of the book-which does make me respect the original story more.
Bronco, for me the 5 crew members should have been a nailed-on detail for the film. Seems logical to me that we would send a delegation. It’s poor writing in the film, to pass off Arroway going with a single line from Hadden – “They still want an American to go.” Why? It’s a non-explanation. The writers should have avoided that altogether and just said the all-powerful Hadden insisted Arroway was going.
Do read the novel. Joss is an interesting character in it rather than the cipher he is in the film.
No Bronco it isn’t. Cube, Cypher, Solaris to name but 3 straight off the top of my head.
Solaris yes, but I wouldn’t call Cube or Cypher “serious SF”. Not in the same way as Contact, Solaris or Space Truckers.
I really like this film, but I haven’t seen it for about 10 years. Maybe time for a revisit.
haven’t seen the movie since it hit cable in 98. I remember not really caring for it because I liked the book but that’s all I can remember about it. Might have to watch it again.
Actually preferred the movie to the book. Saw this on a two-fer w/ Batman and Robin summer ’97 as a freebie preview a few days before it officially opened. Contact was quite good. Bats-well not so much, ya know?! quite a bowser of a flick, even then I knew it was shitsville.
Anyways-I liked this one. Foster was great, I like Matthew M in it and ditto John Hurt. Pretty interesting flick all the way around.
Tom – you preferred the movie to the novel? That’s interesting. Can I ask why?
Matthew’s performance just grated with me. I think he’s miscast.
Droid – Space Truckers… you owe me a new keyboard, this one is now coated with nasally expelled 7UP.
Wolf-because as a novelist Sagan didn’t cut it. That’s all.
Fair enough.
I have only read Contact by Sagan so I haven’t got any comparison to go off. But I recently saw a magazine article that covered several of his novels. The mag was incredibly complimentary about his writing!
I’ll have to read a few more…
Bartleby, great topic, and fascinating dissection of the movie “Contact.” I enjoyed your discussion — I definitely agree that the film stretched a bit in order to ham-handedly emphasize the question of “faith” — that even Ellie, a scientist, has to call upon it at some point. But I didn’t find it overly intrusive — I do think the film comes down squarely on an absolute assurance that Ellie did in fact travel, witness and contact an alien intelligence.
Bartleby, you say that “In the end, the movie doesn’t deal with human/ alien first contact – but simply Ellie reunited with her dad. Nice enough, but it is anti-climactic. Plus, the Big Message For Humanity is basically; “Thanks for coming. You can go home now. We’ll call you again sometime…’”
I disagree with this though. I think the film fairly blatantly shows and tells us that Ellie did in fact travel through time and space via an Einstein-Rosen Bridge transit system, that she views evidence of alien intelligence and civilization on this journey, culminating in her encounter (contact) with the alien ambassador in her father’s form (who says point-blank, “we thought it would make things easier for you”), where she learns a little about the ancient intelligence that built the transit system (intriguingly, even above their own abilities), and where he gives her assurances that humanity will take other steps, that this is just the first of many.
I think what makes that whole scene so poignant for me is the clear assertion that it is NOT Ellie’s Dad, and Ellie’s slow realization of this (once her emotions have backed off a bit) is really moving and sad — as is the Dad-alien’s quiet sympathy for her as the situation dawns on her (Dad is still gone, she still has no answers about life after death, etc.). Knowing this, it’s kind of intriguing that wearing her father’s persona (alongside their access of Ellie’s mind, thoughts and memories) has unconsciously made the Dad-alien actually act parentally toward her, and with real affection. It’s as if he is not just there to look like Ellie’s Dad, but to stand in his stead, as if he cannot help but adopt a few of her Dad’s characteristics (as viewed by Ellie and the aliens via her memories). There is so much tenderness in his goodbye to her, as he kisses her cheek (he certainly doesn’t have to do that, after all) — as if he cannot help but reach for that small, sweet contact with the daughter of the human shape he wears. It’s really nicely done.
I also liked her relationship with Joss in the film better than you did as well — to me he’s a pretty interesting wild card who offers both intelligence as well as an emotional openness that complement’s Ellie’s drier scientific aspects. I didn’t mind the “love” conversation because to me he wasn’t shutting Ellie down, he was just saying that *for him* his religious beliefs are unquantifiable and as unprovable as love. That there are things — at the very least, emotions — which cannot always be rationally explained away. I did 100% agree with you that I really, however, missed the scene with Focault’s Pendulum! It was one of my favorites in the book.
ThereWolf, Sagan wrote only one actual novel, “Contact” — the rest are nonfiction explorations of humanity, civilization, and space.
They are absolutely wonderful books, and I cannot recommend them too highly. While I enjoyed “Contact,” it is by far my least favorite among his books. He was ironically more poetic when discussing human evolution, the library at Alexandria, the possibilities of alien intelligence or space travel, and more. My favorites among his books would include “The Dragons of Eden,” “Cosmos” (the series was fabulous too), “Pale Blue Dot,” “The Demon-Haunted World” (scarily accurate depiction of today’s life as a new ‘Dark Ages’ in the face of reason), and also his wonderful books with wife Ann Druyan — “Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors” and “Comet.”
“Contact” remains one of my favorite movies. When it came out, I was obsessed. I went over and over again, the first time I’d done that since college, and just as beautifully described here by Bartleby, that knockout opening zoom-out from Earth still kills me every time, back out through our solar system, the Oort cloud, the Eagle nebula, then through all those amazing blue galaxies… and seen on the big screen, they were extraordinary, as was Ellie’s journey.
My one complaint years later is that I find Foster a bit overwrought on her journey, but from listening to the DVD I’m sure this was probably due to Zemeckis, who simply could not leave things alone (I was amused to learn from Foster’s commentary, for instance, that in a kiss with McConaughey Zemeckis literally removed then relocated her eyebrows on her face! So I do kind of think the film has an occasional weird feeling of “overproduction,” of overdoing certain shots or moments. But ultimately it has great meaning for me and I’ll always love it.
Cheers!
Pingback: PCN Summer Flashback: The Gate (1987) | Pop Culture Ninja--Geek News and Reviews
Excellent review. I disagree with a few points, but an excellent perspective. In particular, I defend Dr. Arroway not pushing her POV on the children in the last scenes. While she believes, strongly, there are other beings in our universe, she is speaking to the children first and foremost as a scientist, and as a scientist she knows she has no empirical evidence of her journey. We don’t know if the confidential report on the 18 hours of static ever went public. She leaves it up to the individual to weigh the evidence (the receipt of the message, its content, and her testimony) to decide.
The 18 hours was actually, IMO, a bone thrown to the reader/viewer to “prove” she did not imagine the whole thing. I would have preferred that that be left out, and leave it to the viewer to decide and/or ponder whether it really happened, and most importantly, whether it mattered in the end, philisophically. To me the philosophy about our place in the universe explored in this film is far more important than the question of whether there is other life in our universe.
Pingback: Summer Flashback 1988: The Blob | Pop Culture Ninja--Geek News and Reviews
Pingback: Summer Flashback 1988: Willow | Pop Culture Ninja--Geek News and Reviews