Animation

Top Ten retro kid’s shows ready for the big screen!

Top Ten retro kid’s shows ready for the big screen!

Remake and sequel hysteria has hit an all-time high these past few years and it isn’t showing any signs of stopping. With Raja Gosnell’s The Smurfs set to destroy more of our collective childhood in a few weeks, and the third installment of Transformers smashing  its way into theaters, exploiting children’s television shows from yesteryear is in vogue.

So, given the fact that Hollywood has designs on completely renovating our childhood memories, I’m going to take the ‘if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em’ approach. You want some stuff to remake, how about a list of titles from the past that could actually be the jumping off point for something interest? Counting down from the least likely to the most, I give you the top ten retro children’s televsion shows ripe for remake. Studio execs, get out your pens and takes some notes…

26Dinosaucers_Love_in_Loch_Ness

10. Denver the Last Dinosaur (1988-1990)/ Dinosaucers(1987)

Denver the Last Dinosaur plumbed the latch-key kid culture of 1980s Los Angeles in a daring and imaginative way; it paired a group of diverse school kids with a dinosaur….wearing a mohawk and sunglasses. It’s a big, green prehistoric critter that warbles when it speaks and yet it’s the only real friend these kids have until it teaches them they have each other. Brilliant. Truly brilliant. How to remake it? Only one way really. Keep the time period. Keep every single one of those costumes and get ILM to do Denver; afterall, they know dinosaurs. And, please, you can use CGI for Denver but don’t even try an animated mo-hawk. It would be a disaster. We know how these things are supposed to look, and practical fx are the only way you are going to get an even half-way realistic hairpiece on a dinosaur.

Dinosaucers on the other hand, is far easier. It didn’t air for very long in the 80s, and although there are a few out there, like my wife, who somehow have the theme song still running in their databanks, most people would be new to this. They are aliens from space who look like humanoid sentient dinosaurs and they are embroiled in a war. It worked for Transformers so why can’t it work here? Not enough to go on?  Pish! If you throw in some amazing fx work for the dino-people and the space ships you might have one of the craziest and entertaining popcorn B-movies in some time. Just don’t go looking for a plot. It’s dinos from space, people! It’s a gold mine!

 zoobilee-zoo-cast-pic

9. Zoobilee Zoo (1986-1988)

One of the weirdest bits of PBS programming, Zoobilee Zoo imagined a world full of anthropomorphic animals living in an entire civilization of their own..and they sing all the time. The theme song promised ‘magic and wonder are waiting for you!’ More like flamboyance and creepiness.  And yet, despite the fact it resembled a more educational and gaudy version of Cats , Zoo was perfectly suited for a young child’s mindset. Whereas Sesame Street focused on practical educational knowledge, Zoo was more interested in how people interact and with finding your inner diva. I’m running images of Baz Luhrman’s Zoobilee Zoo through my mind and it looks like a rave crossed with community theater–it just might work. Or how bout Terry Gilliam’s Zoobilee Zoo? Yes, I think it has a nice ring to it. Just stay away from realism. I don’t want to see a flick with a young kid wandering into the mutant quarantine zone and encountering the disfigured Zoobles, who just want to find a life beyond Thunderdome.

raaidun

8. Read All About It! (1981)

Please tell me someone remembers this. Its pretty much the reason I included it at all. That and it would be great to have a movie in theaters that reminds kids that once upon a time we had things called newspapers and print media. It aired on TVOntario and right here on MPT as well. I used to watch it as a kid, and remember seeing the entire initial series in school. The storyline was rather interesting as science-fiction; it followed a couple of intrepid kid journalists who learn that history is being changed by an cosmic, time-traveling entity called Duneedon(he’s the thing in the pic above; admit it,you thought it was the genie from Pee-Wee’sPlayhouse). Incorporating lots of library know-how with sleuthing and actual reporting skill, Read All About It! was sort of the perfect thematic mix for a PBS program. Of course the production values, the acting and the direction sucked. So what about a remake that stays true to the source story and the details of the old-fashioned journalism? That alone would give the pic a unique bent. These kids don’t just hit the net? They have to go to the library?

small_wonder

7. Small Wonder (1985-89)

Ok, its uncomfortable confession time. One of the first acknowledged little boy crushes I had was on Small Wonder’s V.I.C.K.I, the robot Ted Lawson creates as a sibling for his biological son Jamie. If that sounds wierd or creepy now, Tiffany Brissette was older than I was at the time and at 6 it never dawned on me that it was wrong to have the hots for a dead-eyed girl that you could conveniently program any whim into. Yea, it was creepy. Even then, when it was just intended to be a cute little sitcom about a kid and his robotic sister, it was creepy. These days, the robotic family member bit has been beaten to death. Look at A.I. or Bicentennial Man. Possibly the best approach to Small Wonder is marrying that sense of family drama to a real sci-fi story that explores the unanswered questions a kid might not ask: if Vicki never grows, what happens to her once everyone else is gone? Does she head out to meet the blue fairy or would a more realistic movie handle that differently? When Jamie is 65 is his 8year old sister still watching his back? Someone call Tim Burton. I bet he could give us a ‘Small’ to really wonder at.

 vinkjar

6. Are You Afraid of the Dark? (1991-1996)

Ok, this is the first show on the list that doesn’t belong as much to my childhood as my siblings. The stories were just a bit tame for my taste and because it was Nickelodeon it was also pretty cheesy on the production end. I remember some specific eps like Bobcat Goldthwait as the Sandman and Aron Tager as the kooky bum-like wizard Dr. Vink–later stories also featured Firefly’s Jewel Staite and Roc’s Charles S. Dutton. What I appreciated about it then was the close-quarters, home-fried campfire story bookends the tales all had. Friends formed a group called The Midnight Society and met in the woods to tell ghost stories.  Many of the stories borrowed tropes from tried and true stories like The Monkey’s Paw or the legend of the Golden Arm. One episode even featured an old theater showing Nosferatu and had the vampire escaping from the film. Unlike the grime and grimace of today’s teen horror, this pre-teen approach was mindful of what came before. Perhaps bridging the age gap and bringing AYAOTD to a wider audience as a family chiller is a good place to begin in jump-starting the dying film form of the horror anthology.

 davidthegnome

5. David the Gnome (The Secret World of the Gnomes) (1985/1987)

This one gets to be here at the behest of my wife. The ultimate cultural cross-over, the show that found its ways to Nickelodeon in the late 80s was a Spanish cartoon dubbed into english with the help of Christopher Plummer(Sound of Music, Dracula 2000) as narrator and Tom Bosley (Happy Days, Father Dowling Mysteries) as David. The original spanish version was based off a Dutch children’s book series that included The Gnomes and The Secret World of Gnomes. The animation had a real illustrated quality to it, and David and his wife were caretakers of the forest, helping and healing the animals that lived in their domain with a combination of medicinal herbs and good old fashioned gnome know-how. Looking like a lawn ornament come to life, David was a tantalizing combo of Marty Stauffer, Martha Stewart and Jerry Garcia all rolled up into a endearing ball of blue and red. So, why re-do it? Well, it would have great potential as a computer animated or even hand-drawn feature if it were to land a good writer/writers. And you could bring Tom and Christopher back for voice parts I’m sure. Plummer has been doing voice-work for Up and 9 recently and I’m sure he’d jump at the chance to hear himself talk, and let’s face it, his voice is perfect for it.

 tranzor_z_001

4. Tranzor Z (Mazinger Z in Japan), 1972

In 1984, when my fellow kindergarteners were reeling over He-Man, Transformers and Voltron I was the dopey kid who was head-over-heels for Tranzor Z. Only problem was while toy store shelves were chocked to the brim with the others there was no Tranzor Z to be found at all. Hey! How was I  to know that the real issue was that I wasn’t Japanese and living ten years earlier?  See, the show that ended up airing on weekday afternoons was a U.S. import of Mazinger Z, a Japanese anime released in 1972. had giant robots with detachable fists fighting the legions of Dr. Hell (Dr. Demon in the U.S. release) and his henchman, who included Lord Ashura (Devileen in the U.S.) who happened to be a hermaphrodite right down the middle; each side of his/her personalities would bicker and fight endlessly with the other. Several elements were cut from the U.S. release including the fact the female robot, Aphrodite A, had breast missles she would fire at enemies.A live-action film could involve hot-shot pilots going off to battle in the robots–big shiny special fx set pieces– without worrying about a convoluted or needlessly complex mythology that might be shredded in the adaptation, ala Evangelion. Just think, it could be like Robot Jox, but actually good and with a budget of more than 3,000 U.S. dollars.

EerieIn

 3. Eerie Indiana (1991)

Perfectly weird and terrifically witty, with a plot hook that felt like Stephen King meets The Wonder Years, Eerie Indiana was one of my all-time fave series as a kid. And as is usually true of the televison I end up loving(*cough* Pushing Daises, American Gothic, Brisco County Jr.*cough*), it was canceled after a  too-short run. Marshall Teller (Omri Katz) is a young boy who moves with his family to Eerie, Indiana and learns that the town lives up to its name. There were ATM machines with a mind of their own, a set of braces that could pick up the hidden thoughts of dogs and in one of the best storylines, a Tupperware sales lady was actually keeping her two sons in a state of suspended animation by sealing them away in bed-sized tupperware. Katz and Just Shankarow, who played Marshall’s sidekick, Simon were a nice fit as the adolescent leads. It was even remade a few years later with more comedy but even less success. A fresh new cast and crew would do well for the show, but let me suggest one of the series’ original headliners for director; Joe Dante, of Gremlins and Matinee. This is definitely his bread and butter.

gargoyles01lg

2. Gargoyles (1994-1997)

It’s frustrating to watch all of these current cartoon movies parade across the big screen when one of the best is still out there gathering dust. By the time Gargoyleslanded, I was well into high school, and not paying much attention to the weekday afternoon toon line-up, but my siblings adored it and I found myself catching bits and pieces when I would come home, and slowly, I was hooked. What began as a riff on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, with a band of varied gargoyles hanging out in New York City with their human female friend became a complex fantasy incorporating Scottish history and mythology, Arthurian legend, and amazingly, entire aspects of Shakespeare’s Macbeth and A Midsummer Night’s Dream. It was a comic book come to life and had the same sort of attention to detail and superb voicework(over half the primary cast for Star Trek: The Next Generation was on board for this one)  that defined Batman: The Animated Series. Creating a live-action version of this would be a no-brainer, though it might take a little bit of refreshing the audience what Gargoyles is exactly. Either way, it has plenty of opportunity for great creatures and special effects and it has the one thing that Transformers, G.I. Joe and their ilk failed to possess; characters and a story we could care about.

hrpufnstufmovie

1. H.R. Pufnstuff (1969)

Wow, where to begin with H.R. Pufnstuf? Created by Sid and Marty Kroft, who were also responsible for the equally odd Sigmund and the Sea Monsters and previous remake victim, Land of the Lost, Pufnstuf is clearly a product of its’ time period, the late 60s. There’s a plot there right? Sure, somewhere, and if you are a child with a thing for mescaline or LSD, it all may make perfect sense. There’s a magic talking flute named Freddy, a six foot dragon that is the titular character and a witch named Witchie-Poo. All of this is so surreally designed that it feels just like a fever dream brought on by a bad roast-beef sandwich eaten too close to bedtime.  If there’s to be a remake, we need someone who can just cut loose and make all of that weirdness come alive up on screen. Forget the usual suspects, go scour the world of tv commercials, music videos and homeless street art and get us a Pufnstuf director. All of this trippiness will no doubt look super-wicked in 3D.

Second trailer for Fox’s ‘Rise of the Planet of the Apes’ gets wild!

Second trailer for Fox’s ‘Rise of the Planet of the Apes’ gets wild!

PCN posted the original teaser trailer for ‘Rise of the Planet of the Apes’ a few months ago, but now Fox has released a longer trailer that focuses on Caesar and the eventual revolution staged by he and his simian counterparts.

 

Although it’s obviously borrowing from 1970′s Conquest of the Planet of the Apes–sans the civil rights angle of that picture– this new version looks intriguing. I’m sold, based on the Weta FX and those scenes of the apes crowded on rooftops carrying some form of makeshift weaponry.

 

The big question for the film comes down to the script. Based on this trailer, Caesar releases the toxin that increases ape and chimpanzee intelligence into the air. Still, even excessive smarts aren’t going to help a much smaller population without the benefit of technological advancement against the entire human race.

 

I’m guessing that another toxin–or perhaps a byproduct of ‘the cure’– will assist in decimating the human beings. If the film can find the right balance between the fantasy of the scenario and the speculative heart of the story itself, this could be a summer sleeper hit. 

 

Either way, this one looks a cut above Tim Burton’s tepid 2001 Planet of the Apes ‘reimagining’.  Rise of the Planet of the Apes will release on August 5th.

Hail Caesar! ‘Rise of the Planet of the Apes’ trailer hits!

Hail Caesar! ‘Rise of the Planet of the Apes’ trailer hits!

Well hello there, you damn dirty apes!

Rupert Wyatt’s Rise of the Planet of the Apes, a  reboot of the classic sci-fi franchise, just got its first teaser trailer.

The buzz for this movie seems to have popped up from almost nowhere. Of course, that can be mostly attributed to this week’s earlier reveal of the ape effects, done by WETA (Avatar, Lord of the Rings) and the brief clips of Andy Serkis’ sentient simian Caesar glaring out at the internet community with suspicious eyes.  Now, the longer trailer is here. So, how does it look? See for yourself

Check the embed below or go watch it directly at Apple:

Incredibly far-fetched right? Beyond the realm of the plausible? Utterly ridiculous. No way is James Franco a brilliant geneticist. No way. As for all that stuff about the primates of the world getting a brain boost and defeating mankind armed only with grunts, feces and bananna peels? I think that’s reasonable.

Seriously, I think this one looks promising. I wasn’t expecting something as grounded in reality (well, to a point) as this one seems to be. The Apes films that have come to us previously, including the original, Burton’s film, and this entries’ most similar relative, Conquest of the Planet of the Apes, have all been decidedly campy in one way or the other. Wyatt’s movie, freed from the constraints of the other stories, has some latitutde as it starts at the beginning. And for once, here’s a prequel that has a story to tell.

How did we get to that point where Charlton Heston is on the beach, screaming at a broken Statue of Liberty? The answer here seems to have something to do with Franco’s scientist, his collaborator Frieda Pinto, and a super-smart ape named Caesar. I like the overall look of the film; there’s something less shiny and more straightforward here. Also, the apes in the film are the first iteration, and therefore have no additional human attributes. No Roddy McDowell riding a horse, just armies of angry chimps and gorillas traipsing about the city streets.

If the script can build the same kind of humanity into the critters that WETA has built into Caesar’s eyes, then we might have the best Apes movie since the original. This has just leapt to the top of my most anticipated summer movies.

‘Kung-Fu Panda 2′ Full Trailer

‘The Illusionist’ Movie Review

‘The Illusionist’ Movie Review

Running time: 80 min Rating:  Rated PG for thematic elements and smoking.Directed by: Sylvain Chomet Written by: Jacques Tati (original screenplay), Sylvain Chomet (adaptation) Starring: Jean-Claude Donda, Eilidh Rankin, Duncan MacNeil

PCN Rating:

The film director is very much like the stage magician in the way he seeks to conjure ephemeral truth out of delicately constructed deceptions. The best of both are those who can transcend the craft and make the illusion so seamless and transporting that it enriches and expands the context it exists in. Famed French cinema artist Jacques Tati, himself not just a director but also mime and comedian, was one of our very best big-screen illusionists. As it turns out, so is Sylvan Chomet, the brilliant animator of 2004’s Belleville Rendezvous and now The Illusionist, an achingly lovely and emotionally deep rendition of one of Tati’s own unproduced screenplays.

 Tati, a man of dry and subtle humors, often explored the human condition through comedy that was less laugh-out loud funny than it was structurally mirthful. There’s a specific and witty joy that runs through films like Playtime and Mr. Hulots Holiday and although Chomet possesses a different, but no less effective, sensibility he captures Tati’s style in both the rich, detailed animation and in the carefully tailored pantomime of the characters, which requires little to no discernable dialogue in order to grasp its intent or meaning.

Chomet has interpreted Tati’s screenplay as a regretful testament to his daughter (although there’s conflict over exactly which abandoned child the story is intended for, as Tati left behind two fitting the bill). The story itself isn’t directly bittersweet or painfully wistful, but exists in its own wrapped-up little world that melds simple, transcendent joy and the wonders of one’s ability with the frustrating realities of the world and the ebbing flow of life. This sounds heavy but when it’s placed in the hands of Chomet and his animators it becomes light and elegantly beautiful, demonstrating the same divine symmetry that exists in the drifting snowfall of feathers that blanket the characters in one sublime scene.

The illusionist of the film’s title is a Scottish stage magician, Tatischeff, who reminds of Tati’s classic Mr. Hulot, roaming about Edinburgh and pitching his brand of old-school magic in the climate of the early 60’s. Now, his once palatable wears are second-rate and antiquated in the face of British rock and roll and strangely androgynous boy bands. Designed like a picture book of individual vignettes and episodes, The Illusionist follows Tatischeff through the moonlight era of his career and life, and focuses finally upon the relationship he has with a young, impressionable maid ( likely a stand-in for Tati’s daughter).

There’s nothing lascivious about this pairing but the style in which the young woman is animated is rather ambiguous as to her actual age, so the father/daughter parable isn’t immediately grasped either. Through patient devotion to their interaction, Chomet makes the bond and the limits of it clear. The young woman believes in the magician’s magic and yearns to see more of it, caught up in the fantasy and shelter he provides and for Tatischeff, one girl’s wide-eyed wonder is worth all of the blue-collar jobs he’s taking to make these miracles reality. Around them are the zany inhabitants of the Edinburgh hotel that include a variety of stage performers fallen on hard times, one of them a suicidal clown.

Animation is a medium that affords filmmakers greater freedom and clarity when realizing stories that might live larger than the constraints of live action might allow. It’s completely plausible that The Illusionist might have existed as easily in live action because it has no living toys, fire-breathing dragons or warrior owls. Just as likely however, is the fact it wouldn’t have had the same magic it gains here by virtue of Chomet’s lush and vibrant illustrated world.

Although Illusionist doesn’t have the madcap surrealism and grotesque exaggeration of the farcical and imaginative Triplets of Belleville, it still utilizes the medium to create a dreamer’s microcosm of emotional energy. Watching Tatischeff and his mischievous rabbit onstage, or lingering as the illusionist and his young charge wander over picturesque Scottish hills, it’s easy to get caught up in Chomet’s vision.

Once we are transported, this world doesn’t let us easily go. Every bedroom, crowded bar or night street is a multi-layered feast for the senses, bursting to the seams with awkward messy life. There’s something more real in the movements and overemphasized mannerisms of these characters than in the choppy stylized jitters of live actors in a big budget action movie. Tatischeff and his little maid live and breath and love and lose themselves over the course of The Illusionist. It’s surprisingly poignant and engrossing to watch this transpire, and Chomet isn’t just a gallant and generous showman, he’s also a wise artist who knows when to pull back the curtains and tease the audience’s internal gears.

Underneath this tender story is something universal about the ways in which we use the veneer of fantasy to express hard or precious truths to one another. In the lie, we might be fully laid bare for the first time and in the withdrawing of that illusion—which will come—will we be satisfied with what remains? In The Illusionist, we are invited into a world that sings onscreen. It isn’t a place one often gets to visit, even at the cinema. When the final frames play, our hearts too are aching, knowing that the mirage will soon vanish and the smoke of the fantastic soon to follow.

Summer Flashback 1999: Run, Lola, Run

Summer Flashback 1999: Run, Lola, Run

The only word I can find that adequately does Run Lola Run justice is “stunning”. This is a film that batters your senses, mixing a dizzying amount of visual style with a breakneck story and a pumping techno soundtrack to leave the viewer staggered, reeling and, well, stunned. This is the film that introduced the world to the gorgeous Franka Potente (shamefully squandered in the Bourne films and that odious tripe Creep), and this is the film that I like to think sums up the late 90’s. 

Run, Lola, Run (Lola Rennt) (R) 81 min.

Written by: Jarv

Ninja Rating:
 
Run Lola Run is a film about chance. I know that sounds a bit unlikely, but the basic premise of the film is that Lola’s imbecilic boyfriend Manni (The Baader-Meinhoff Complex’s Moritz Bleibtreu) has managed to land himself in a world of hurt. He owes some angry drug dealers 100,000 marks, as a direct result of a cretinous blunder, and Lola has precisely 20 minutes to raise the cash for him, if she fails then he’s to be killed. The film plays 3 different scenarios of Lola’s madcap sprint across Berlin to try to raise the cash.
 
The first telling of the story actually came as a bit of a surprise to me on first viewing. I saw it almost completely unspoiled, with my only knowledge of it being a brief review in FHM (I was only 19, leave me alone) that described it in glowing terms, but revealed nothing of the plot. We all know how this type of story is meant to work: Lola raises the cash, saves the day, possibly the dealers die. So when the film cut into the animation sequence of Lola running down the stairs and the soundtrack goes ballistic, I have to say I was caught completely off guard. Then when the story concluded in roughly 20 minutes to reset to the start I was somewhat confused. That isn’t to say I wasn’t enjoying myself, because I was hopping about in my seat with a wide grin plastered across my face (wondering if an E would make the experience even better, actually), just that it wasn’t what I was expecting. By the conclusion of the film I had an almost irrepressible urge to watch it again immediately (and I’m glad I didn’t give in to that one). 
 

Potente’s performance as Lola is hard to describe, and hard to criticise. The nature of the film meant that she had to run (at a fair old clip) over 20 miles per day. Even typing that sentence makes me want a pint and a cigarette. Therefore the film requires a significant amount of physical acting, and a certain presence but doesn’t really give Potente a great chance to shine. That her performance could even be described as memorable is, I believe, a testament to how good she is in this film. Bleibtreu has a similarly thankless task as Manni is a complete dingbat, and that he manages to elicit any sympathy is clearly the mark of a fine actor- he was also excellent as Andreas Baader, another unsympathetic character.
 
However, the star of Run Lola Run is writer/ director Tom Tykwer. Run Lola Run is redolent with his stylistic choices and his flashy editing. This is a film that operates best as an adrenaline rush, there’s a frantic sense of urgency to proceedings that is entirely down to Twyker’s decisions. He hasn’t, I’m sorry to say, made anything remotely as good as this again, but Run Lola Run is a film that would top almost any resume, so that isn’t surprising.
 
Run Lola Run is also a film that rewards repeat viewing. I’ve seen it many times now, and each time I spot something new that reinforces the themes, or notice a tiny detail that has implications for the film. It’s ostensibly a superficial film, but if you scratch at the surface then it has concealed and worthwhile depths. It may appear to be a celluloid amphetamine, but it is actually a well thought out treatise on chance and the implications of our decisions. It’s entirely up to the viewer which of the three versions of the story is the real one, and I think which one you decide depends entirely upon what you bring to the film. Personally, I always go for the happy ending, even if that is the most unlikely one. 
 

Overall, I heartily recommend Run Lola Run. Tykwer’s adrenalised masterpiece is a joy of film. It’s a heart-pumping thriller with hidden depths, and one of the most enjoyable films of the decade. I can happily sit back and have it molest my eyeballs and pound on my ear drums as Run Lola Run is a frankly incomparable film experience and a truly great work, and far more than just a brilliant assault on the senses.

Simply fabulous, and I believe this is the only review of Run Lola Run ever written that doesn’t use the word “kinetic”.

Animation Spotlight: The Sky Crawlers

Animation Spotlight: The Sky Crawlers

 They are known as the Kildren; eternally youthful adolescents who pilot WWII-style futuristic fighter-planes and participate in to-the-death aerial dogfights for the benefit of the mega corporations Rostock and Lautern. In the world they come from, there is no more war or conflict, and to ensure it stays that way the Kildren will compete in these global death games, filling the vacuum with an endless battle in the skies. Living like the lost boys and partaking in various adult activities including smoking and sex, the Kildren live a continuous, looping childhood; the banality of this existence is only brightened by the thrilling shooting matches they engage in while up in their planes.

grohotuncom-the-sky-crawlers-promo-2-1080p-h264-6-chts003

The Sky Crawlers (PG-13) (2008) 122 min. directed by: Mamoru Oshii. voicework: Rinko Kikuchi, Chiaki Kuriyama, Shosuke Tanihara, Bryce Hitchcock, Ryo Kase.

 Written by: Nathan Bartlebaufgh

Ninja Rating:

That plot could be the center of a big Hollywood sci-fi picture aping Top Gun, but it’s actually the work of anime maestro Mamoru Oshii, the director responsible for films like Ghost in the Shell, Jin Roh: The Wolf Brigade and the live-action Avalon. Oshii, typically known for his philosophically dense dialogue and languorous, complex visual style, takes a step closer to main-stream storytelling with Sky Crawlers. The plot almost reminds one of a Howard Hawks adventure pic or even the recent French film Der Rote Baron, and while the film contains its share of thoughtful and introspective moments its primarily centered around characters and story.

skycrawlers_still_c566_08-reduced

The beautiful hand-drawn animation blended together with a near photo-realistic CGI presents rolling English countryside, vast manor houses and golden-hued cloudscapes where soaring machines fire endless rounds of ammunition, shells raining down to the world below. The battle scenes recreate the daredevil antics of WWI pilots and there is even a Red Baron character called The Teacher. When I saw the stills for Sky Crawlers months ago, I was worried that those sequences would come off like video-game cut scenes. At first, thats exactly what they seem like, but Oshii frames even these images with a painters eye for composition and the zig-zagging planes, framed against either rain-clogged thunderheads or wispy white cotton balls, are almost poetic in their movements.

Visually lush and patient in regards to it’s texture and detail, set to a sometimes tranquil, sometimes thrilling score,  The Sky Crawlers works as a purely sensory experience. In fact, all of Oshii’s films do. My previous gripe with his work, and indeed most of the recent anime feature films, is that its almost too obscure in its intent and holds the audience at an unecessary arm’s length. The Sky Crawlersis the first Oshii film in, well, perhaps ever, that actually manages to cultivate a strong emotional core in addition to an aesthetic one. The general layout is still subdued, but there are humans here behaving as humans  and each of them has human issues. The Kildren do not age, and this brings its own set of problems, but ultimately they still struggle like your average person.

skycrawler%20

Yuichi Kannami is the Kildren pilot at the center of the film and it opens with him landing his plane on the Rostock air-base in Northern England. He has no memory of the base or where he previously was, but picks up the swing of things quickly, befriending fellow pilot Tokino and starting a tension-filled relationship with his  commander, the icy Suito Kusanagi. She obviously posesses information she refuses to share with Kannami, and as the plot evolves secrets both on the ground and in the sky begin to manifest themselves. The battles in the air punctuate the human drama and the movie finds a nice balance between the action and the intrigue.

The story is speculative fiction and it’s been intelligently adapted from the novels by Japanese author Hiroshi Mori. Mori’s other novels are known as rikei mysterys because they revolve around some sort of scientific or mathematical puzzle. The Sky Crawlers novels were constructed in such a way where it was not always immediately clear what was happening or why, and as the series progressed all of the elements became available to solving the mystery.

skycrawlers

To a lesser extent, Oshii does that here, weaving events in and out of one another and suggesting what the flow of time must feel like to a person trapped in an endless state of youth. However, theres a clear narrative thrust and the film doesn’t fly off on too many theoretical or existential tangents as the Ghost in the Shell sequel did. Instead there is a far more natural rhythym to the drama in Sky Crawlers and the film has an almost pastoral idealism that reminded me more of Hayao Miyazaki (particularly Porco Rosso, another anime involving dog-fights) than any of Oshii’s ouvre.

I haven’t enjoyed an anime film this much in quite some time, and the market has been rather scarce with quality product. A new Miyazaki is on the way right now, and there have been a few choice entries like Satoshi Kon’s Paprika and the recent The Place Promised in Our Early Years,but that’s about it. Oshii’s Sky Crawlersis a breath of fresh air in that respect and an exciting remembrance of the potential of anime to tell thoughtful stories in detailed fantasy worlds. It’s not just a great animated film, it’s a great film period and well worth recommending to the both the hardcore anime fan and the filmgoer who could care less about little moving scribbles. Yes, it really is that good.

PCN Movie Review: Another ‘Toy Story’, well told

PCN Movie Review: Another ‘Toy Story’, well told

It isn’t surprising to learn that Pixar’s third installment in the Toy Story series is another homerun for the team. What caught me off guard is just how well ‘Toy Story 3′ compliments and completes the cinematic journey of Woody, Buzz and the gang. Visually charming, with much wit and mirth applied to the jokes and gags, TS3 also finds a sincere emotional wellspring from which it draws the richest and most poignant messages of the entire franchise. It may be strange to say, but Toy Story tells a tale of life’s passage, youth lost, and finding heroic responsibility in the face of obsolescence, and in doing so it is every bit the movie that Indiana Jones 4 wanted to be but couldn’t.

Written by: Nathan Bartlebaugh

Ninja Rating:

Director Lee Unkrich and writer Michael Arndt once more find plausible human traits within the plastic hearts of their artificial characters and it’s a welcome refreshment to see that although this Toy Story has been designed with kids in mind, it doesn’t coddle us through the final chapters. There’s also no shying away from an intensity of feeling that may be sure to draw tears from the older members of the audience.

Finding a way to continue a series when you have already struck gold twice before can be challenging, but from the opening scenes and onward, TS3 draws us right back into that familiar and enchanting world of Andy’s room, and those characters we have come to know and love. Now, Andy has grown up and is heading off to college, and leaving behind his faithful toys of childhood. For Woody and the rest, they are faced with a life without purpose, challenged with the choice of staying behind in boxes in the attic, waiting for the fateful day they are thrown away, or being donated to a nearby daycare.

When Woody and Buzz, best friends and earnest leaders of this little community, make the decision to relocate to Sunnyside (the daycare), they envision a world where they can once again make children happy. Trying to move onward and upward from Andy’s growing away from them, the toys approach their new surroundings with purpose. Alas, it isn’t what they expected.

While the cuddly on the outside, sinister on the inside, Lotso’ Huggins Bear (a cheerfully plotting Ned Beatty)—the self appointed leader and coordinator of this tribe of toys—ensures the new arrivals that Sunnyside is a wonderful place, this isn’t the reality they encounter. The older, more experienced toys have a system worked out; they get to be shared with the older children who care and have affection for them. Meanwhile, hapless newbies are sacrificed at the altar of the toddlers room, where anything goes, and each day is a whirlwind of chaos, snot and being errantly stuffed into grubby little mouths.  

It isn’t long before Woody, Buzz, and Jessie are hatching a plan with the other mainstays, Rex,Hamm, and the Potato Heads, to bust out of Sunnyside and find Andy once again. Along the way they encounter all manner of imaginative silliness and lean some significant and painful lessons about moving on in life and losing that which was familiar and comfortable to us.

 It’s easy to see the early parallells to sending elderly relations off to nursing homes, or the way in which the cruelty and indifference in the daycare and the fateful trip to the junkyard have odd but unmistakable echoes to the Holocaust. In a lesser movie, those elements would overpower the film, but Pixar has invested a great deal of heart into these characters, and we have a history with them.

Wisely, the series has moved forward in the lives of Woody and Buzz, and unlike, say, the Shrek movies, these two pals aren’t rebooted to the bickering rivalry they shared in the first film, or even the budding bond of the second. Both are older and a bit wiser about their world and what the future holds, and what Hanks and Allen help put up on screen is one of the most endearing and honest portrayals of lifelong friendship I’ve ever seen in a family film. There are sequences in the climactic junkyard milieu that are sincerely touching and have something to say about the connections we make in this life.

But forget all this talk of serious themes and melancholy overtones, because those elements have been expertly inserted into a movie that is even more comedic and bouyant than the first two. Owing much to great prison escape movies of the past, there are also some dazzling comic-action set pieces and I was delighted by the uses the movie finds for an erratic barrel of monkeys.

Kids won’t need to worry about the film being fearsome or too somber, it isnt. What’s up on screen is as chipper and envigorating as playtime itself, and the subtext of the story will resonate with parents who may find they are enjoying those high energy escapades just as much as the quieter, more resonant stuff.  

 

TS3 zips along with an array of brand new characters, including a fussy, conflicted Ken doll who has his world undone when he finds his Barbie, or Mr. Pricklepants (Timothy Dalton), a thespian hedgehog who treats a young girl’s tea parties as if they were classical theater. Of the returning characters, the Potato Heads may have it the roughest at the daycare, and the scenes where their disembodied parts end up in dank, dark regions of the child anatomy are predictably hilarious.

Even Lotso is made out as a multi-layered character, and Beatty’s world weariness, echoed in lines like “”No owners means no heartbreak.We own ourselves, we control our own destiny” is contrasted against his big fuzzy, pink exterior that ‘smells like strawberries.’

In the end, Toy Story 3 is a grand concoction that probably marks as much of a genesis for Pixar as the original Toy Story did when it arrived in 1995. Finally, the studio has reconciled the push and pull of telling adult stories that also fasicnate and capture the imagination of a younger generation. Toy Story closes that gap between adulthood and childhood with a wise and knowing frivolity, and the result is a series that has truly gone to infinity, and beyond.

How To Train Your Dragon Review

How To Train Your Dragon Review

Rating: PG for sequences of intense action and some scary images, and brief mild language.Running time: 98 minutes

Directed by: Dean DeBlois & Chris Sanders Written by: Dean DeBlois & Chris Sanders & William Davies. Adapted from Cresidda Cowell’s book.

Starring: Jay Baruchel, America Ferrera, Gerard Butler, David Tennant, Craig Ferguson, Jonah Hill,  Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Kristen Wiig

PCN rating:   

 Dreamworks’ How To Train Your Dragon is a great example of everything I love about animation. It’s a big, bold, colorful movie that isn’t afraid to blend stylized characters with exquisitely real and breathtaking details. Unlike the recent slate of warmed-over kid’s films trying to exploit 3-D technology as a cash-in, Dragon swoops in and gathers the technique under its wing and folds it confidently into the final product . What ends up on screen is just as compelling and exciting as the images that James Cameron brought us in Avatar, but with the added bonus of a more focused story and greater scope and freedom in the flying sequences.

Adapted from the novels by Cressida Cowell, Dragon re-imagines the world of the book slightly to create a land of danger and peril, with hearty, rugged Vikings doing battle with the large, scaly pests of their age; dragons. Right from the outset, the audience is introduced to young Hiccup (Jay Baruchel), a dubious Viking lad who doesn’t have any of the fierce swagger, motley spirit or physical imposition that everyone, including the women of his clan, possess. Hiccup serves as narrator and protagonist, and in a stunning and clever opening sequence we are introduced to his village, his blustery father, Stoick the Vast, and the numerous species of dragon that terrorize their land.

In his world, Hiccup has been taught that killing dragons is one of the greatest feats a Viking can achieve. They are monstrous pests that steal livestock and burn homes, and the whole village has based its social system around their ability to slay them. There are even dragon slaying schools, one of which Hiccup attends when Gobber, the class instructor, coerces Stoick to let him join. His classmates are all true blue Viking whelps who take the slaying seriously, but Hiccup can barely lift a shield.

Among these warrior adolescents is Astrid (America Ferrera) who is far more gifted and fetching in Hiccup’s eyes than her posse, comprised of Snotlout, Fish Legs and the bickering twins, Tuffnut and Ruffnut. When he does manage to capture a dragon, using his own ingenuity, it turns out to be a Night Fury, the most fearsome and secretive of all the species. When it comes to time to kill the beast, Hiccup can’t do it and so he frees the creature, it doesn’t immediately eat him, and a friendship is born.

The dragon, nicknamed Toothless, is a beguiling and endearing creation. Hiccup mostly observes him at first, from a distance, and eventually realizes the animal has a broken tail wing, which prevents him from leaving the valley. Toothless isn’t a giant, leather-winged monstrosity but rather he’s lithe and catlike, part salamander and part panther, with big yellow eyes and a wide mouth that curiously turns upwards in a snickering smile.

In a wonderful melding of the computer animation and classic cartoon styling, Toothless is both an exaggerated character and a visually realistic one. When he’s running around the valley and standing on his hind legs staring at Hiccup he resembles Stitch, the alien visitor from Sanders and Dublois last film. But when Hiccup is riding on his back, or running his hands across Toothless’ scales, we could be looking at a photographic image, so great is the clarity and detail.

The film works as well as it does, though, not just because of the visual elements but because of the story, which brings the Hiccup and Toothless relationship to the forefront, and forces Hiccup to follow his own instincts regarding right and wrong as opposed to the perceptions of his village. Sanders and Dublois have a strong and sincere handle on odd partnerships in fantasy films. They ran a wickedly comic spin on E.T. in Lilo and Stitch, with a young girl befriending a horribly destructive menace from space and here they evoke the wild wonder of connecting with a force of nature.

I was reminded of the touching relationship between the boy and his horse in The Black Stallion. When Hiccup rides Toothless for the first time, it’s a moment of staggering beauty and visceral excitement, but also one of emotional connection. This aspect energizes and amplifies everything else that happens.

There is a confidence in the work here that is reminiscent of films like The Never Ending Story or even Star Wars. The final battle that closes the movie, with dragons soaring frantically through the air, combating a larger more fearsome menace is easily comparable to the assault on the Death Star at the end of A New Hope. There is a unfettered sense of imagination employed, and although it never hesitates to have fun with the concept, Dragon never disrespects its characters or its audience.

In regards to the characters, Toothless was easily my favorite, but I was also won over by Butler as Stoick the Vast. It is unusual in films of this type for the animation and the voice work to mesh so completely that we buy the character as something more than a ‘cartoon’. Butler imbues Stoick’s Asterisk build and big bushy beard with enough soul and Viking spirit, that even as his bulk is overpowering the film’s frame, his interior is revealing softer, nobler compartments that his son has barely guessed at. It’s amazing and often subtle work, and it echoes the approach taken with the 3D.

Aside from Avatar, this is one of the first times I can wholeheartedly recommend the 3D experience over a 2D one. Although never flashy, Dragon really mines the technology for big thrills, daredevil action sequences and yet reserves the most startling effects for very small, throwaway moments. There is a scene where ash is falling like snow from the sky, and it could very well be blanketing the seats in the theater. It is impressive and never draws attention away from the story.

How To Train Your Dragon is one of those welcome and joyful discoveries that we don’t get often enough; a satisfying and endearing adventure that brings its audience, both young and old, together. It imagines a world that will be worth returning to, over and over, for years to come.

Top 25 Animated Movies of the Decade: Part 2

Top 25 Animated Movies of the Decade: Part 2

December 10th, 2009–

Ok, here we go. The top ten animated films of the last decade. There’s not much to say here that I didn’t mention in the first installment of this article. Honestly, this was such a great 10 years for animation in general, that even limiting the choices and ranking them has been a fool’s errand. But, I guess I’m that fool and the following represent what I think are the finest accomplishments of the form. Each and every one of these could be competing for number 1. Here goes…

10. Up (2009) Directed by: Pete Doctor

An old man who looks like he’s been assembled out of soggy cardboard boxes? An asian child shaped like a chicken McNugget? A house pulled to South America by thousands and thousands of balloons? Up is filled with unlikely elements but its these that push it a little further away from Pixar’s business as usual. The result is something of a wonder. Up fires off its most emotionally powerful and poignant scene right up front: a young girl and boy meet, spend years dreaming together, get married and miss those far-flung plans when life intervenes. It might just be the most touching moment in any of the Pixar films, indeed, in animation in general and a lesser movie wouldn’t recover. But Up is first and foremost a golden age pulp adventure, with forays into the deep jungle, unusual creatures and long-lost expeditions. Carl Fredrickson and his young friend are wonderful characters, and their exchanges are part of the film’s lifeblood. What impresses me is that Up is actually thrilling; the adventure scenes that take place on the flying zeppelin with armies of canine-piloted planes attacking Carl and the boy are more dazzling and breath-taking than Kingdom of the Crystal Skull ever dreamt of being. Instead of being complacent, or resting on their laurels, Pixar takes a risk and rises to the occasion. A beautiful and absorbing classic, regardless of whom you might be.  

9.  Howl’s Moving Castle (2005) Directed by: Hayo Miyazaki

Japanese director Miyazaki has rightfully earned the status of animation master. Working dilligently and dutifully for decades, he has made some of the most endearing and imaginative fantasies I have ever seen. I honestly thought he might have hit his stride after 2001. But he came back with this magnificently intimate adaptation of Dianne Wynn-Jones young adult novel Howl’s Moving Castle. It is old hat to call a Miyazaki movie visually stunning, but what he accomplishes here is a new feat; he’s blending the worlds of Japanese fantasy and European fantasy into an enticing stew. Every frame has an old-world elegance and an Eastern sense of the mystical and exotic. The castle itself is one of the greatest movie spaces I’ve ever seen. From the outside it is a hulking, anthropomorphic goliath, striding across the countryside. On the inside it’s a cozy chamber that encases the characters in both their struggles and their joys. And while there is plenty of inventive joy here, there’s also a real sense of danger and sacrifice. Evoking the terror of war and the frivolity of stunted adolescence, HMC has an expansive sensibility similar to The Wizard of Oz. It is to Miyazaki’s credit that this film has all the magic and intelligence and heart that one possessed. And give Lasseter and company props for getting a great voice cast, led by Christian Bale, to deliver one of the best dubs I’ve heard for a foreign language film.

8. Metropolis (2001) Directed by: Rin Taro

Every once in awhile you will come across a piece of art that remakes or draws from another substantial work and manages the near impossible feat of creating something comparable in its effect. Rin Taro’s Metropolis accomplishes such a feat. The film is an animated adaptation of  Osamu Tezuka’s Metropolis, itself a manga version of Fritz Lang’s 1927 science fiction spectacle. Building a layered world of robotic servants and upper-class societies vying against an increasingly hostile lower caste of disenfranchised peasants, Metropolis adopts Tezuka’s simplistic and childlike illustrative style (the characters all look similar to his famous Astro Boy) and crams the frame full of eye-popping and gorgeous details. Drawing from the pop-art of Tezuka, the German Expressionism of Lang, and a kind of 40′s noir atmosphere, Taro’s movie is an epic and provoking futuristic fable. His characters aren’t lost in his staggering future city, and the movie’s exploration of artificiality vs. humanity and the social definitions of a ‘person’ are more thought-out here than in a similar live-action film like A.I. In addition, Metropolis has a stellar soundtrack made up of 20s jazz, and later renditions of blues classics. The final, apocalyptic melee goes down while Ray Charles croons ‘I Can’t Stop Loving You’. Those are exactly my sentiments towards this overwhelming anime achievement.

7. The Incredibles (2004) Directed by: Brad Bird

I absolutely adore this movie. I was a huge fan of Bird’s 2-dimensional classic The Iron Giant, and as far as I’m concerned Incredibles takes everything that movie did so achingly well and amplifies it. For starters, this is a true family movie; not in the sense it is simply appropriate for all members, but rather it’s actually got something worthy and worthwhile to say about and to each member. In a time when Hollywood seems determined to crap endlessly upon the waning concept of the nuclear family, Bird’s movie celebrates familial bonds, the desire to press beyond mediocrity and how reinvigorating passion for life is best approached as an effort made by the whole unit. Take all that away, and you still have the single best superhero film of the decade; a movie that understands the silliness of the suits, the draw of heroism, and the stronger stuff that defines someone as ‘incredible’. I guess it’s also worthwhile to mention that this is both a terrifically funny and awesomely thrilling movie.  A masterpiece.

6. Mary and Max (2009) Directed by: Adam Elliot

 As an artist who primarily works in two-dimensions with pencils, paints and pastels, I have always been in awe of those who could work in that third dimension without the aid of a computer. Greater still is the talent who can not only wring emotion and meaning from lumps of clay, but actually amplify the depths of human feeling with a dimple here, a fold there. Mary and Max, the first feature length film from Harvie Krumpet director, Adam Elliot, is a tremendous work of understanding and empathy and it pushes the boundaries of what we accept as real ‘friendship’. It’s a truly heart-felt and emotionally disarming story about a lonely little girl living in Melbourne who randomly picks a pen pal out of the phonebook. The person she finds is an extremely overweight New York man in his 40′s who happens to be an ex-mental patient. Now, that might initially sound sinister, but Elliot avoids this completely. Max, the New Yorker, is  gladdened by Mary’s correspondence because it is really the only consistent source of care he recieves. See, Max is diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome, and he hides away from the world in fear. Mary, hearing of his diagnosis, sets out to learn all she can about the illness in hopes of curing her friend and freeing him from his cage. What happens from there spans 20 years and is sure to bring on both tears of laughter and tears of emotion. A live action film couldn’t deliver the impact this one has. Elliot creates a drab, gray noir world of trouble and adversity for Max and Mary and the one ephemeral thing he can’t physically animate–their friendship–is the very thing that is most fully realized in this gentle, heartening tale.  

5. Persepolis (2007) Directed by: Vincent Paronnaud &
Marjane Satrapi

In graphic novel form, Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis was an inspired, witty and insightful memoir. It told the story of the author’s own childhood and growing up in Tehran under the rule of the Shah and the ayatollahs. In animated form, with French voice actors (where Satrapi now works and lives), Persepolis becomes more immediate and more colorful, despite the fact it’s mostly in black and white.  Whether she is marching about with a shirt that says Punk isNot Ded, rocking out to Eye of the Tiger, or fleeing arrest due to the views or opinions of her family and friends, the movie shows all facets and sides of Satrapi’s experiences in Iran. Like Bashir, but with a livelier, more endearing voice, Persepolis stretches the use of animation to include instruction on the realities of the world in which we live. But what is most impressive and excellent about the film version is that it never ever loses its very human voice and what emerges from all those eye-catching black and white squiggles is a very real and very intriguing portrait of a girl growing up and making sense of the world she finds herself in.

4. Belleville Rendezvous (The Triplets of Belleville) (2003) Directed by: Sylvan Chomet

Sylvan Chomet’s Belleville Rendezvous is a gloriously weird and off-kilter vision. It is also so unique and singularly intriguing that I recall being surprised to learn that after breathlessly watching the entire thing, I had heard only a handful of spoken dialogue. For all intents and purposes, this could be a silent film. And yet, the characters have about three times as much spirit, charm and definition as those in films where the script runs for 300 pages. The animation is also unconventional, but it has a traditional, ink and water-color style that reminds me of the illustrations that would accompany the Tin-Tin stories. Chomet is an artist of impeccable craft and his details, although mostly wacky, are placed so perfectly that he achieves exactly the right oddball response he’s going for. Most of this one feels like a dream; it’s a story that might as well be taking place in a completely other universe, and I love that about it. The world of animation can be used to show us things we simply couldnt see otherwise, or reveal emotional truths that live action might veil, but here Chomet is introducing us to an entirely separate story where every single element could only exist in animation. None of it could be lifted out of where it is. It simply wouldn’t work. I’ve heard from those who are just put off by it. It’s too offbeat or too erratic. I don’t think so. I find it inspiring and wonderfully persistent in its oddness. My wife finds the animation so grotesque that she refuses to rewatch it. She isn’t wrong, but that’s another part of why the film is endearing to me. These aren’t cookie cutter characters or an easily digested story with the usual beats. These are the absurd dreams of Sylvan Chomet, spilled from his head and running rampant up there on the screen. I can’t think of a better use for animation than that.

3. Coraline (2009) Directed by: Henry Selick

Like many of my favorite films, Selick’s Coraline took awhile to grow on me. When I first saw it in 3-D at theaters my mind was preoccupied and I mostly reacted to the rather dark storyline. On a second viewing, at home, the film jumped to life in a way that it hadn’t in 3 dimensions. Coraline is possibly the best fantasy about the tension between childhood and the adult world I have ever seen. The stop-motion is expertly concieved and the visuals are everything that is great about Jan Svanmaker, the brothers Quay and Terry Gilliam in one delightful and gloriously dark package. The atmosphere can only be described as otherworldly. The tone is halfway between classic Grim fairy tales and that mopey sense of despoiled wonder that a rainy day can bring to a kid. There are songs, a cat voiced by Keith David, and the most frightening witch to ever terrorize a child. All of that can go to explaining the appeal, but in truth, the movie is this high up on the list because when I returned to it ….I connected with it. Whats up there on screen is so fantastical and bizarre, but in addressing the desires and dreams of a child, I found my own specific childhood reflected in its rythyms and wild imaginings. When I watch Coraline, I’m pulled in by a great story, yes, but I’m also picked up and set back down in a POV that is now a few decades removed from me. That, in and of itself, is a wonder.

2. Wall-E (2008) Directed by: Andrew Stanton

One of the great movies, Wall-E is equal parts sweet love story, social commentary and visionary science fiction. Detractors like to call the first half-hour of so brilliant and then slag the rest. They are, of course, only half right. The near silent-film that opens Wall-E is quite nearly perfect and it captures the most unlikely courtship in the history of cinema. I loved it, I did. But for me personally, if the film had remained there in the junkyard of Earth, between Wall-E and Eva, then it wouldn’t have the power and effect it has. Yes, there is some great pantomime and heartwarming character work going on in those opening 30 minutes. Theres a lonely desolation too, cataloguing the ruin of the human homeworld, that is actually rather daring for a film aiming to snare families. But what happens on the Axiom, the world Wall-E encounters there, and the subsequent adventures are what give the story it’s context and the characters their drive. Wall-E would have been a supremely sweet and delicate little movie if it had been two robots tooling around Earth. The filmmakers here are more generous and ambitious. They gave us that movie, and a second one too. One that peers through the eyes of true science fiction and imagines mankind awkwardly and tepidly trying to steer itself back on course with the help of a robot more decidedly human than all of them. Few films can conjure such iconic imagery and specific emotions. Wall-E makes the love between a trash compactor and an i-pod seem like the greatest love story every told. And when it’s over, how can you argue?

1. Spirited Away (2001) Directed by: Hayao Miyazaki

Enchantment can take alot of forms. Spirited Away hits so many different notes of enchantment, that one could get lost trying to figure out how the movie does what it does. It essentially takes Alice and Wonderland and replaces the nonsense with a thoughtful and wise invocation of self-identity and finding your place amidst a world that doesn’t always make sense. Miyazaki has never imagined a crazier and more biologically diverse universe than the one that shows up here. Asian mythology bursts at the seams and lets loose a veritable parade of indescribable creatures, phantoms, dragons, witches and even a magical frog. There is a loving, hand-made quality to the animation and the film is an embarassment of riches. When No-Face, the mask-wearing carnivore with an out-of-control appetite threatens to consume every living thing in the movie, and he’s faced down by Chiro’s sensible patience, I was won over. This could easily be a surreal and fleeting dream, but the film is anchored by its story and its central character. I am a fan of the movies because I enjoy being delighted, surprised and transported. Spirited Away does every one of those things so completely that the experience of it lingers with you after you have left it. The savor and spice of this profoundly entertaining animation leaves it’s aroma on the mundane world it inhabits.